“The Change” hits the streets - TDR reviews the album
Written by administrator on October 26, 2004 to Editorial.
Here we are, three TDR news editors sitting around the table (virtually, at least) discussing the new Marie Fredriksson album “The Change.” It’s her first all-new album in eight years and the first one since her severe illness that took her away from the limelight for two years.
Visa Kopu: Without even hearing the songs, you can really see that this album speaks about her recovery. The titles like “2:nd Chance,” “Love 2 Live” and “The Good Life” are just that. After I heard “2:nd Chance” for the first time, I was a little disappointed. It was so unsurprising.
Judith Seuma: When Eva Dahlgren released “Lai Lai” people criticized the album as being nothing but her comeback and coming out with her love for Efva Attling. But well… what else should it have been, in that situation? But what surprises me is that [Marie’s husband] Micke has written five of the twelve songs.
Thomas Evensson: As you probably know, I’m not a typical Marie fan. She’s always been too dull and sad, musically, for my taste. So when I got “The Change” in my hands, I was less than enthused, to say the least. I was also surprised about Micke’s big role, but even more by the fact that this album has been recorded over such a long time, even before her sickness.
Now, let’s continue with song-by-song reviews:
THE CHANGE
Thomas: Uh, must be one of the worst songs I’ve ever heard by Marie. The lyrics are deep and depressing – naturally – but the music is just strange, obviously symbolizing her confusion and agony. The orchestral version of “The Change” symbolizes, to me, that she’s gone through this change and survived. It’s much more airy and happy… but still a bit strange.
Judith: My first thought was: “Wow, what an intro!” and I’ll stick to that. A dramatic song with great guitars and superb vocals. I already know I won’t get ever tired of this one. It’s one more song for the repeat list. I also feel this song is connected to the drawings in the booklet.
Visa: A dark and loud song. Very different from the orchestral version of the song. Not a thing I would usually think about, but “2:nd Chance” seems a little offplaced after this track.
2:ND CHANCE
Judith: I think “2:nd Chance” is a very beautiful song. A beautiful, slow love song with Marie’s touch. It’s a mix between “Tro” and “Waiting For The Rain.”
Visa: This is a song I’ve needed to listen to many times before it has really sounded good. As I already said, I found this a little unsurprising. It sounds too much like the “I en tid som vår” album. Of course one can think it’s just that Marie and Micke have found their own style and are still keeping it after all these years. But now that I’ve heard the song more, it starts to sound like a good choice for a single. But it definitely isn’t a catchy radio song.
Thomas: I have a little bit of the same feeling for this. The words are strong, but the music is too much, too “Marie,” too obvious, and yet somehow it leaves me indifferent.
ALL YOU’VE GOTTA DO IS FEEL
Judith: A powerful song written by Micke. You can’t really call this a “B-side”, even though it was track #2 on the “2:nd Chance” single, can you? The lyrics invite you to live your life at the maximum. “… you can get a piece of the cake so much bigger and better.”
Visa: Well, I thought this was a rather good B-side and I was surprised to see it on the album track list. The arrangement is little bit too noisy or something. But I like to notice that Marie tries to break out of the Marie & Micke style I just criticized.
Thomas: I agree that M&M try to break out of their “format”, but I don’t think they succeed. I don’t like the song much, and I’m usually allergic to trumpets. And the words don’t really mean anything to me either.
APRIL SNOW
Visa: Yet another “this could be from ’I en tid som vår’ or ’Äntligen’” song. However, the gospel choir is a good spice.
Judith: A jazzy-soul sound in the beginning with gospel at the end. The guitar intro strikes me. Me, a guitar solo lover, and Staffan Astner, a most impressive guitar player. Makes me dream of a club tour or similar. I’ll just close my eyes and enjoy.
Thomas: Hmmm, the best song, so far, but why does it take over a minute and a half before the song really takes off? The guitar is nice, but the gospel choir is terrible. I’ve been in a gospel choir myself and I loathe myself over it. White people can’t sing gospel. This song is about a friend’s breakup by the way.
LOVE 2 LIVE
Judith: A happy funny song written by Micke. It has a catchy chorus. I am all smiles at the end of this one.
Visa: Now we’re talking! The intro sounds like the music in those inserts in the Austin Powers movies. Don’t know if that’s especially a good thing. However, this is the first song so far that sets good vibes for me.
Thomas: Definitely! I really like this intro. But, the words and the dreadful vocal arrangement killed it a bit for me. A big thumbs up for the intro, though.
Judith: Now that you say that, I thought it sounded like the old Batman series track!
MOTHER
Thomas: This is Marie Fredriksson 101. BUT it’s been written by Micke. I don’t like it nor dislike it. However the lyrics are weird, as it’s Micke who has written them from Marie’s point of view. I don’t think it works. If Marie had sung it from Micke’s point of view it would’ve made more sense maybe.
Judith: Another song by Micke, this time a ballad. The first time I listened to it it didn’t fit with the lyrics sung by Marie. Which doesn’t mean the music and the voice and the song in general is bad. Giving it a second listen made me shiver.
Visa: This song doesn’t really catch. I’m not a lyrics person and this song doesn’t have anything really catching in the music. And Marie’s voice sounds a little tight.
MANY TIMES
Judith: Another poppy song to my ears that feels like the sad version of “Love 2 Live”.
Visa: Hmm, “Many Times” doesn’t catch either. To compare “Love 2 Life” and “Many Times,” I must say that this one is much weaker.
Thomas: The intro sounds stolen from “Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band”. This is a standard Marie song… sounds like it’s lifted off “Den ständiga resan”, which is her worst album ever. Nope, don’t like it at all.
ALL ABOUT YOU
Visa: This one I like a lot. The song is nice and it has a good arrangement. It has again that M&M touch, but this time it’s a positive touch.
Thomas: Oh yes! Finally a great track! This is of course also a standard Marie song, but the good kind. It makes me at least smile. I wish more tracks were like this.
Judith: This one’s also written by Micke. Nice love song which reminds me of the new songs on the “Äntligen” album, including the trumpets.
THE GOOD LIFE
Judith: Marie has already sung covers of various songs in the past and this is the first time she includes one on an album. She makes an excellent work with “The Good Life”, originally made famous by Tony Bennett and later performed by Frank Sinatra.
Thomas: “The Good Life” is a song Marie enjoys performing live when she’s doing informal concerts, a cover obviously, sounds like it’s been recorded before Marie became ill. She does it nicely. However, the song itself is boring since I don’t like jazz. I guess it’s more or less the same as the original, covered many many times.
Visa: I don’t remember hearing the original “The Good Life,” but especially the intro sounds very much stolen from the original. Or I don’t know if you can talk about “stealing” in cover songs? Anyway, the arrangement sounds much stronger than in Marie & Micke’s own tracks.
BAD MOON
Thomas: This one many of us have already heard. The song was “released” a few years ago as a stolen demo. This version of the song sounds a lot like the demo, some parts may even be from the demo. And this song is definitely recorded before the cancer struck. Not bad, probably a Roxette reject.
Judith: “Bad Moon” was everyone’s favorite of the few demos that surfaced. For me it is a like a wish come true that she has included this masterpiece on this album. Thanks, I say.
Visa: A nice song, what can I say. And if Thomas says that it’s “not bad”, this can really be a masterpiece.
A TABLE IN THE SUN
Visa: A soft and jazzy song to the end. Even though it’s not the last song, it feels like it’s written to be one.
Judith: Marie has said she has dreamt of making a jazz album and she wasn’t wrong. This song brings tears to my eyes. No wonder the Nissan Jazz Band in Halmstad regretted letting her go.
Thomas: This song just makes me yawn. And if I ever hear an electric piano again it’s too soon.
THE CHANGE (The Orchestral Version)
Visa: As I said, this is very different from the loud #1 track version. Sounds like the arrangement was made at the same time with “The Good Life.” If the first version is autumn, this is spring when the flowers are blooming again.
Judith: I must admit I was surprised with this last track. I expected it to be an instrumental version only, without vocals, so a wide smile showed up on my face when Marie’s voice began to flow in the room. I have always liked it to have different versions of one song. That’s why I also enjoy demos and live versions. This song could have been in a Broadway musical.
Thomas: I’ve already said what I wanted about this track, but I also think it sounds like a “happy-ending-in-a-musical-song” - which it sort of is!
* * *
Judith: All in all, I think this might be one of Marie’s best albums together with “Den ständiga resan” and “I en tid som vår”. Full of feelings, deep lyrics, touching music and impressive vocals. All what I like about Marie in one, together, again. What strikes me is the fact that Micke wrote five of the songs included on this album, but what leaves me amazed is that I wouldn’t have been able to distinguish which ones belong to who if I wouldn’t have read it anywhere.
Thomas: This album is not what I would buy, and I don’t think that the “average Joe” will either. What this album’s biggest problem is, is that there are 12 tracks and more or less 12 different music styles. We have pop, we have rock, we have gospel, we have jazz, you name it. It sounds like a total mess to my ears. Swedes love Marie in Swedish, while they always were a bit reluctant toward Roxette. Same with Per Gessle and Gyllene Tider. This album will confuse the public and that’s not good. Marie has never been great at writing lyrics in English, but I think she’s done a decent job on these five tracks she wrote. In conclusion I would like to welcome our Marie back, even if I don’t like the album.
Visa: I don’t have a strong opinion to either direction. I used to like Marie’s music a lot, but it has sounded too same for too long. There are many good songs with good arrangements, but then there are songs that are too much of a filler. And I have to agree with Thomas with the different musical styles. It’s almost like Marie and Micke are experimenting all kinds of styles without knowing which ones to choose. However, what I’m very happy about is that Marie’s health is better now and she has finally released new music for us.
Other articles with the same topic
- TDR reviews "Party Crasher" (November 26, 2008)
- Year in review 2007: Gessle on tour, Marie and husband in studio - but where was Roxette? (January 5, 2008)
- "Att vara Per Gessle" - a review (December 7, 2007)
- Mikael Bolyos gets reviewed (July 6, 2007)
- Happy birthday, Per! (January 12, 2007)
107 comments
AntiMario said on October 26, 2004 19:54:
Great review. I wish I could join you, TDR bosses :)
animalkingdom said on October 26, 2004 19:58:
I think that’s just pretty terrible to read!
First of all, why is a person, who simply dislikes mostly anything Marie has put out, analysing the new album?
These reviews are generally very negatively orientated - and quickly put together...I doubt that a certain “reviewer” didn’t even listen to the songs more than once or twice, which takes the basis away of those little sentences!
joyrider said on October 26, 2004 20:12:
finally a nice picture of marie!
edit: but i think she has a touch of a wax-model on the pic (... like at madame tussaud’s ;)
StillFar said on October 26, 2004 20:15:
I can’t see the point of THAT review by Thomas either...but that’s just my humble opinion.
Polisson said on October 26, 2004 20:21:
THE GREAT REVIEW FROM THE GREAT PER GESSLE AND GYLLENE TIDER (and Eva) FANS!!
Truly an amazing journalistic piece. WOWW!!
Rich-UK said on October 26, 2004 20:21:
imo a detailed, objective review like this with “I love it; I’m indifferent; I don’t like it” is far more interesting than “it’s amazing” written about each track ;-) - interesting... Rich
Judith (moderator) said on October 26, 2004 20:24:
LOL Rich, that might have been the never published review of mine :D
xarrrr said on October 26, 2004 20:25:
yeh i agree.... whats the point in reviewing an album if you’re just gonna be all “oooohs and aaaaahs” because of who’s recorded it. thats just lame!!!
is it soooo wrong to have an opinion these days???
to the tDR team. thanks :)
Polisson said on October 26, 2004 20:28:
Sincerely, I really think we don´t need this kind of opinion news...people saying “Den standinga resan” is a bad album...bufff.
gyllene_tjej said on October 26, 2004 20:30:
I think that neither Judith nor Thomas - a huge Marie fan on one side and a Gessle fan on the other (or anyone of us for that matter) could provide us with a 100% objective review. And by the way, was it really meant to be objective? I don’t think so. After all each of them speaks from their own point of view. There is no accounting for taste and I think we should respect everyone’s opinion. Personally I am very grateful for what I could read, well done guys! It is a review - quite professional to my mind and well, nobody intended to bash the album or take it to the skies.
Whatever reactions there are I want to say THANKS to Marie for proving once again she’s a little miracle :)
on_a_mission said on October 26, 2004 20:30:
good, albeit slightly predictable review.
zaine said on October 26, 2004 20:30:
great ideas there thomas, and well respected (by me at least)... hmmm
I think I’m gonna be feeling the same way you do...
StillFar said on October 26, 2004 20:38:
just to make clear, I don’t have a problem with different opinions about her work, but don’t really know what ’white people can’t sing gospel’, ’I don’t like Jazz’, ’allergic to trumpets’ have anything to do with a text you’re trying to create in order to give people insight on an album...
Denstandigaresan said on October 26, 2004 20:41:
I like the fact Thomas reviewed it... it would be a bias review if Marie fans reviewed it... cause we’d probably all go on about how wonderful it is, even if it is cack! It happens!
I for one don’t do jazzy stuff.
I’ve not been able to order it yet. But I will get it.
per_mson said on October 26, 2004 20:46:
I think this was a really great review given from really different persons. That’s how a review should be. Not only critics or praising, but a little bit of both.
What I don’t like is when people have to start nagging as soon as someone might have a negative opinion about Roxette & Co. Please have a look at the news at http://www.dailyroxette.com/article.php/1700#comments
so you know what I mean.
Yet again, great job!! :-)
patolucas said on October 26, 2004 20:52:
After i’ve read the comments from TDR,what can i say?.....no comment.
purplemedusa said on October 26, 2004 21:31:
No comment... maybe one; Thomas, u seemed like you were having PMS there!! LOL
rox-kuryliw said on October 26, 2004 21:34:
Did they do this for Per’s solo album, or GT album i just wonder ? or is this the first time ?
Maciek said on October 26, 2004 21:41:
about ’experimenting all kinds of styles’
I think that if Marie would record a 12 rock songs or pop songs, you wouldn’t also enjoy it.
You’ll never be satisfied....
@Thomas E.
I don’t understand how a person which writes “”Den ständiga resan”, which is her worst album ever” could be TDR moderator
Rox_Nox2003 said on October 26, 2004 21:42:
I appreciate the fact that all 3 were honest about it, but what this is making me feel now is that a “generalized” poor negative views on the album are growing considerably...
Which is sad for me because Marie’s music credibuility has always impressed in both solo and Roxette ... I can call myself a typical Marie fan I do actually find a lot of my person within her songs or in the way she sings that I can relate to somehow...
It’s just that ...there is a bit of dissilusion about this record that I don’t know it’s taking away all its life and meaning to a certain extent...
The Change is not meant to be a commercial success and less not a commercial record in terms of sales ..it’s just a very honest simple compilation of songs that resemble a story, a true story about Marie in many ways besides her struggle over the last 2 years. It is more than normal that she could not be away from it to write songs about It would have not sence and from a songwriter point of view it would been nothing and untrue.... This is just for the music that it is and that is how we at we us that have followed Roxette’s path over the years and not necessarly anyone else ...
So why not just have it on our CD player every now and then and just listen to it and ok enjoy it or not ... but do go beyond there ... this “stigma” of judgment is something to put aside as for this album ..it is what it is and the rest has no importance ...
rox-kuryliw said on October 26, 2004 21:43:
Yet one of TDR reviews is a fan of per’s music and not marie’s as i understand (fact as i see) , so i think its a very pridictable review really so nothing new to my eyes at all. I just feel more personal opinion than music opinion was included. Its like giving me a michael jackson album to review even though iv never been a big fan.
Never mind all to the own, not a correct review in my book.
TheChange said on October 26, 2004 21:47:
Thomas: You are obviously a Per’s fan.
Judith: You are a Eva Dahlgren’s fan.
Visa: Bue...
So...Who cares about what you thinks or who takes seriously your opinions?Are you moderators from TDR,oh my God!!Please God save their souls!
animalkingdom said on October 26, 2004 22:01:
Given that this site is roxeteer’s (I guess) he can do whatever he wants! I know I would (ahem...;) but since TDR is respected from the Roxette camp, too - official or not - I find these reviews somewhat unnecessary and showing kind of bad journalistic behaviour (or whatever people call it).
Let the real reviewers give their 2/6’s or 3/5’s on the front-page - - have the fans show their pointviews at Small-Talk!
General information and insights about the songs would have been good enough! This is too rich! :/
Rox_Nox2003 said on October 26, 2004 22:04:
Funny stuff:
Bad Moon a masterpiece? If Thomas says is not bad then IT REALLY IS A MASTERPIECE!!!!!:) Thanx Thomas ...
The different styles within the album: it gives me too feelings - excitement and scepticism. I love the idea of having loads of different stuff within a record (not so much as it was with our forever “beloved hated” HAND lol) but all 12 sounding totally different ummm i’ll wait to see.
A remark to Thomas: emmm would it be OK if u had the “for me” in your opinions like “It’s the worst song ever ...etc” cause this thing with the verb TO BE causes a lot of mess and missunderstanding and creates arguements uncessarly ..if it’s clear that what u think is only what U think than it’s ok than an “almost” pretencious sort of universal statement when it’s not. Don’t take this personal it’s a just a cool way to express ourselves in more clearly and undertandingly. And by the way ... I love “Den Standiga Resan” ..sorry :( LOL
I am not a jazz fan at all but this jazzy feeling Marie has is something slighty different from traditional. But what really moves me are those more sort of spiritual songs with alterantive sounds and backing trakcs and almost acappela singing ...strange beautiful mix ...a swedish Enya in a different verge.
But then ... without the poprock feeling given by Per without all those “na na na na na na na” in the middle ... the meanigless lyrics the fuzz and the happyness and the 60s influecial style and mood on Per’s songs (some of them) ... how could I ever not like him? Bring the bear catch some sun ...
roxlad said on October 26, 2004 22:06:
Wow, we should call this site ’The Flaming Roxette’!!!! :-)


Rich-UK said on October 26, 2004 19:52:
Great to see an objective, detailed review by the TDR Editorial - thanks! Looking forward to the album ;-) All the best from Rich
Log in to reply